<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calm Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/05/calm-down.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/05/calm-down.html</link>
	<description>Dealing with software projects in real life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel Brodzinski</title>
		<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/05/calm-down.html#comment-1842</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel Brodzinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/05/calm-down.html#comment-1842</guid>
		<description>Agree on that one. Yet still it&#039;s hard to control emotions, no matter if your goal is to answer professionally (as you advice) or not answer at all. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My experience with &quot;keep it business&quot; responses is that sometimes it brings another load of undeserved attacks on you. It depends on emotions of the adversary too. Even when you decide to answer giving some time for both sides is usually a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree on that one. Yet still it&#8217;s hard to control emotions, no matter if your goal is to answer professionally (as you advice) or not answer at all. </p>
<p>My experience with &#8220;keep it business&#8221; responses is that sometimes it brings another load of undeserved attacks on you. It depends on emotions of the adversary too. Even when you decide to answer giving some time for both sides is usually a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Sacamano</title>
		<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/05/calm-down.html#comment-1841</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Sacamano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 12:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/05/calm-down.html#comment-1841</guid>
		<description>Pawel - what about a &quot;keep it strictly business&quot; response?  I have had a couple of colleagues who had a habit of sending me abrupt,  aggressive emails, usually with several senior managers on the CC list.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;While a rigorously professional response may have made the sender angry, it made me look good to all the managers - and more often than not I ultimately got what I wanted out of the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pawel &#8211; what about a &#8220;keep it strictly business&#8221; response?  I have had a couple of colleagues who had a habit of sending me abrupt,  aggressive emails, usually with several senior managers on the CC list.</p>
<p>While a rigorously professional response may have made the sender angry, it made me look good to all the managers &#8211; and more often than not I ultimately got what I wanted out of the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

