<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software Product Success Stories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/10/software-product-success-stories.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/10/software-product-success-stories.html</link>
	<description>Dealing with software projects in real life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/10/software-product-success-stories.html#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/10/software-product-success-stories.html#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>Interesting!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m going to go right over there and take a look at this.  It sounds like the same thing that you found in your little time tracking application is the thing that we&#039;ve been building into &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://liquidplanner.com&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LiquidPlanner&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I too believe that hours are way too small an increment to use for recording this kind of data.  Days are a much better unit.  Ideally you would let folks update the items as they did it.  That way if they want to do it monthly they can.  But if they&#039;re &quot;super-organized&quot; they can do it right then and there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to go right over there and take a look at this.  It sounds like the same thing that you found in your little time tracking application is the thing that we&#8217;ve been building into <a HREF="http://liquidplanner.com" REL="nofollow">LiquidPlanner</a>.</p>
<p>I too believe that hours are way too small an increment to use for recording this kind of data.  Days are a much better unit.  Ideally you would let folks update the items as they did it.  That way if they want to do it monthly they can.  But if they&#8217;re &#8220;super-organized&#8221; they can do it right then and there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

