<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask Your People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/05/ask-your-people.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/05/ask-your-people.html</link>
	<description>Dealing with software projects in real life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel Brodzinski</title>
		<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/05/ask-your-people.html#comment-1993</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel Brodzinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/05/ask-your-people.html#comment-1993</guid>
		<description>There are many web-based PM applications. Unfortunately most of them have mostly simple features without much of advanced functions.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Among application I was playing with I have quite a good opinion about TenForce (which I have &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/11/tenforce-review.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reviewed &lt;/a&gt;here by the way), although it&#039;s been a while since I checked the application. Another option is Project-ON-Demand if you expect something more like MS Project although personally I believe that lightweight solutions can be much better.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyways it all depends what you expect from your software. The more different features you need the harder it&#039;ll be to find suitable solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many web-based PM applications. Unfortunately most of them have mostly simple features without much of advanced functions.</p>
<p>Among application I was playing with I have quite a good opinion about TenForce (which I have <a HREF="http://blog.brodzinski.com/2007/11/tenforce-review.html" REL="nofollow">reviewed </a>here by the way), although it&#8217;s been a while since I checked the application. Another option is Project-ON-Demand if you expect something more like MS Project although personally I believe that lightweight solutions can be much better.</p>
<p>Anyways it all depends what you expect from your software. The more different features you need the harder it&#8217;ll be to find suitable solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candice</title>
		<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/05/ask-your-people.html#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Candice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/05/ask-your-people.html#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>I recently came across another blog, that the best way to include everyone in the PM foodchain in all it implementation (including its decisions) is through using a PM software which feature web-based collaboration, because it puts a lot of habitual emphasis on good tracking techniques and relations between project team members.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;After talking, (rather analysing) to many colleagues about, it kind of makes sense.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And so after much googling the only two PM software I could come up with are &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.project123.com/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Project123&lt;/a&gt; and Action This.com. How is that possible??? Is web-based collaboration that much of novelty?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Please help,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Candice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across another blog, that the best way to include everyone in the PM foodchain in all it implementation (including its decisions) is through using a PM software which feature web-based collaboration, because it puts a lot of habitual emphasis on good tracking techniques and relations between project team members.</p>
<p>After talking, (rather analysing) to many colleagues about, it kind of makes sense.</p>
<p>And so after much googling the only two PM software I could come up with are <a HREF="http://www.project123.com/" REL="nofollow">Project123</a> and Action This.com. How is that possible??? Is web-based collaboration that much of novelty?</p>
<p>Please help,</p>
<p>Candice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

