<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Emergencies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/11/on-emergencies.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/11/on-emergencies.html</link>
	<description>Dealing with software projects in real life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel Brodzinski</title>
		<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/11/on-emergencies.html#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel Brodzinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/11/on-emergencies.html#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately it&#039;s hard to judge whether hiring manager tells you the truth or not. The only reasonable method to know before being hired is to cross-check it with someone who already works in the company, but it works only if you have a friend there already.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I worked for a company which suited to both models and to be honest I don&#039;t see how I could verify them. However if I&#039;d had a second chance I&#039;d have left them after 3 months. I&#039;d have spent these months checking how things really looked like instead of putting all my energy in fixing first flaws I saw.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you dig deep after a couple of months you should know what is the reality and what was a wishful thinking of hiring manager. If they differ too much, well, maybe it&#039;s time to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately it&#8217;s hard to judge whether hiring manager tells you the truth or not. The only reasonable method to know before being hired is to cross-check it with someone who already works in the company, but it works only if you have a friend there already.</p>
<p>I worked for a company which suited to both models and to be honest I don&#8217;t see how I could verify them. However if I&#8217;d had a second chance I&#8217;d have left them after 3 months. I&#8217;d have spent these months checking how things really looked like instead of putting all my energy in fixing first flaws I saw.</p>
<p>If you dig deep after a couple of months you should know what is the reality and what was a wishful thinking of hiring manager. If they differ too much, well, maybe it&#8217;s time to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/11/on-emergencies.html#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brodzinski.com/2008/11/on-emergencies.html#comment-2051</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually found myself working in both of those situations between two different jobs.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Any suggestions on detecting this &quot;style&quot; of management when speaking to a hiring manager?  I&#039;d like to not be in that situation again.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually found myself working in both of those situations between two different jobs.  </p>
<p>Any suggestions on detecting this &#8220;style&#8221; of management when speaking to a hiring manager?  I&#8217;d like to not be in that situation again.</p>
<p>-Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

